President Donald Trump's revised travel ban faces two major legal tests this month when federal appeals courts on opposite coasts take up challenges to an executive order that the administration says is urgently needed for national security and opponents say discriminates against Muslims.
The first hearing comes Monday in Richmond, Virginia.
Federal immigration law gives the president broad authority to bar foreign travelers from entering the United States. The Trump administration's new policy temporarily suspends the U.S. refugee program and blocks new visas to citizens of six majority Muslim countries.
Before the order could take effect in March, a judge in Maryland and one in Hawaii halted enforcement of critical sections, pointing to comments by Trump and top advisers indicating they wanted to bar Muslims from entry.
On Monday, a panel of more than a dozen judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit will consider whether to leave in place the Maryland decision siding with challengers who say the order violates First Amendment prohibitions on government denigration of a particular religion.
Judges are likely to have questions about the administration's national security justification for singling out the six countries - Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen - and about the relevance of Trump's statements before and after he took the oath of office.
In his March ruling, Maryland U.S. District Court Judge Theodore Chuang wrote that the "history of public statements continues to provide a convincing case that the purpose of the Second Executive Order remains the realization of the long-envisioned Muslim ban."
Justice Department lawyers want the Richmond-based appeals court to lift Chuang's injunction that applies only to the part of Trump's order that would temporarily block new visas for 90 days.
How quickly the 4th Circuit will rule is not known. But in an unusual step, the court bypassed the traditional three-judge panel to review the case as a full complement of as many as 14 judges. Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson, a Ronald Reagan nominee, will not participate Monday because his son-in-law, Jeffrey Wall, will argue the government's case as acting solicitor general.
To resurrect the administration's policy in full, the Justice Department would have to win in Richmond and in its upcoming appeal of the Hawaii ruling at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit - or eventually persuade the Supreme Court to intervene.
A three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit has scheduled oral argument for May 15 in Seattle.
The revised travel order followed widespread confusion and protest in January after a first version caused deportations and detentions of people already aboard flights to the United States as the order was signed. The 9th Circuit in February upheld a court order that suspended the original travel ban, leading to the president's revamped version.
The new order dropped Iraq from the list of excluded countries and did not touch green-card holders and valid visa holders, as the first order had.
In Richmond, government attorneys will ask the court to limit its review to the language of the order. The ban does not mention religion, and the administration says it is designed to give officials time to assess existing screening procedures for entries from countries that Congress and the Obama administration previously identified as areas of "concern."
The Justice Department said in court filings that the lower court's reliance on campaign statements made by then-candidate Trump is "unprecedented": "The court should have focused on official acts, not perceived subjective motivations."
Top law enforcement officials from 13 states, including Texas, Arizona and Florida, backed the administration in court filings, urging the 4th Circuit not to interfere with "an area of strongest executive authority" and arguing that foreign citizens do not have a constitutional right to enter the United States.
The challenge in Maryland was brought by organizations and individuals, including Muslim U.S. citizens and Muslim green-card holders who are trying to reunite with relatives who would be affected by the ban. They are being represented by the National Immigration Law Center and the American Civil Liberties Union.
Allowing the policy to go forward harms the individual plaintiffs by "prolonging their separation from their loved ones, most of whom remain in dangerous conditions abroad," according to their attorneys, led by ACLU lawyer Omar Jadwat.
Opponents argue that the president's travel order specifically violates the establishment clause of the First Amendment that forbids the government from favoring or condemning a particular religion.
"The anti-Muslim message embodied by the order singles them out for particular condemnation and stigma because they are Muslim immigrants," the ACLU filing said.
Diverse organizations representing technology companies in Massachusetts, art museum directors, religious leaders and labor unions filed briefs opposing the administration's policy.
More than 40 former national security, foreign policy and intelligence officials, including former secretaries of state Madeleine Albright and John Kerry, also signed on to a brief saying the blanket ban is misguided and would undermine U.S. security by adding to the narrative that the United States is at war with Islam. The order will "impair relationships with the very Muslim communities that law enforcement professionals rely on to address the threat of terrorism."
National security is not at risk, the former officials said, because travelers are already subjected to vigorous vetting before visas are issued.
A coalition of about 50 constitutional law professors joined a separate brief insisting the president's remarks must be considered. Even if the court defers to the president when it comes to immigration and national security, the professors said, "it is hard to imagine a clearer case of governmental action motived by animus toward a single religion."
Attorneys opposed to the ban drew parallels to the 1944 Supreme Court case Korematsu v. United States and urged caution. In that case, the court deferred to the executive's national security concerns to uphold the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II.
University of Texas law professor Stephen Vladeck, who signed onto a brief challenging the first iteration of the ban, said Korematsu's lesson is that "even - if not especially - when the government claims a discriminatory policy is justified by amorphous national security concerns, courts should treat such claims with great skepticism."
The Washington Post
Mon May 08 2017
Donald Trump's revised travel ban faces two major legal tests this month when federal appeals courts on opposite coasts take up challenges to his executive order.
Lelaki dipenjara dua tahun, cederakan adik kandung guna pisau pemotong daging
Seorang lelaki dihukum penjara dua tahun oleh Mahkamah Sesyen Selayang kerana mencederakan adiknya menggunakan sebilah pisau pemotong daging.
Perang Iran-Israel: Malaysia pantau kesan terhadap ekonomi - Tengku Zafrul
Kementerian Pelaburan, Perdagangan dan Industri memantau rapat perkembangan ketegangan geopolitik di Asia Barat termasuk membabitkan Iran dan Israel susulan letupan di Isfahan hari ini.
"OIC dah tak bermakna, tak berguna dalam meredakan ketegangan"
Pandangan dikongsi Prof Dr Salawati Mat Basir, Pakar undang-undang antarabangsa, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM).
Perjuangan PBB banyak disekat oleh AS dan EU
Sementara itu, Prof. Madya Dr. Mohd Yazid Zul Kepli berkata tidak wajar menyalahkan Pertubuhan Bangsa-Bangsa Bersatu (PBB) yang telah konsisten mengutuk tindakan israel dan berusaha gigih dalam membawa penyelesaian damai dalam isu ini.
Tindakan Israel mencetuskan ketegangan lebih buruk di Asia Barat
Pakar Undang-undang Antabangsa, Kulliyyah Undang-undang Ahmad Ibrahim (AIKOL), Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia (UIAM), kesediaan Iran untuk bertindak balas dengan segera dan tegas menunjukkan bahawa mereka tidak akan berdiam diri dalam menghadapi sebarang ancaman terhadap kedaulatan dan keselamatan negara mereka.
Perang Iran-Israel: Kerajaan mesyuarat petang ini, termasuk bawa pulang rakyat Malaysia
Kerajaan akan mengadakan mesyuarat khas petang ini bagi membincangkan situasi semasa di Iran termasuk kemungkinan membawa pulang rakyat Malaysia di negara itu susulan serangan rejim Israel.
Usaha tingkatkan kadar gaji penjawat awam diumum Hari Pekerja - PM Anwar
Cadangan penambahbaikan, usaha tingkatkan kadar pendapatan bersih penjawat awam akan diumumkan pada Hari Pekerja, kata Perdana Menteri
Mangsa serangan buaya boleh minta bantuan tabung JKM - Nancy
Mangsa serangan buaya atau binatang buas boleh memohon bantuan daripada Jabatan Kebajikan Masyarakat (JKM) menerusi Tabung Bantuan Mangsa Serangan Binatang Buas.
Iran nafi diserang Israel, anggap propaganda media Barat
Pegawai Kerajaan Iran mendakwa mendakwa, ia hanyalah sebahagian daripada propaganda media barat, untuk mengelirukan pandangan dunia.
AWANI Ringkas: Beras dibuang sebab telah rosak, tidak selamat
Ikuti rangkuman berita utama yang menjadi tumpuan sepanjang hari di Astro AWANI menerusi AWANI Ringkas.
7 juri dipilih dalam bicara kes wang sogok yang dihadapi Trump
Tujuh juri dipilih dalam perbicaraan kes wang sogok Donald Trump di New York, perbicaraan jenayah pertama terhadap bekas presiden Amerika Syarikat.
Berita antarabangsa pilihan sepanjang hari ini
Antara pelbagai berita luar negara yang disiarkan di Astro AWANI, berikut adalah yang paling menjadi tumpuan sepanjang hari ini.
Perbicaraan skandal Donald Trump - bintang porno bermula
Donald Trump menjadi bekas Presiden Amerika Syarikat pertama yang menghadapi perbicaraan kes jenayah.
Bicara kes bayaran tutup mulut yang dihadapi Trump bermula dengan pemilihan juri
Donald Trump akan menjadi bekas presiden pertama dalam sejarah Amerika Syarikat (AS) yang dibicarakan atas tuduhan jenayah.
Trump gagal tangguh, perbicaraan tetap berlangsung 15 April ini
Ini merupakan kali pertama bekas Presiden AS dibicarakan melibatkan bayaran menutup mulut kepada seorang bintang filem lucah.
Biden menang pemilihan peringkat awal di Dakota Utara
Dalam pemilihan peringkat awal di Dakota Utara, terdapat 13 perwakilan ditawarkan dan kebanyakan pengundian dilakukan melalui undi pos.
Berita antarabangsa pilihan sepanjang hari ini
Antara pelbagai berita luar negara yang disiarkan di Astro AWANI, berikut adalah yang paling menjadi tumpuan sepanjang hari ini.
Perbicaraan Donald Trump bermula 15 April
Ini merupakan kali pertama bekas Presiden AS dibicarakan melibatkan bayaran menutup mulut kepada seorang bintang filem lucah.
Berita antarabangsa pilihan sepanjang hari ini
Antara pelbagai berita luar negara yang disiarkan di Astro AWANI, berikut adalah antara yang paling menjadi tumpuan sepanjang hari ini.
'Demokrasi AS berakhir jika saya tewas pilihan raya' - Trump
Trump memberitahu penyokongnya jika beliau tidak memenangi pilihan raya, ia bermakna kemungkinan demokrasi AS akan berakhir.