Universities in North America have something called the tenure system where professors are appointed and are then guaranteed academic freedom.
Once they achieve tenure, they cannot be pressured to leave their positions as an academician for any reason (well, it’s very difficult to be sacked, let’s just say that).
They can conduct unconventional research, teach in creative ways and make comments based on research and knowledge that they are considered experts in.
Basically, it gives them the confidence and assurance that they are the intellectual elite who have a responsibility to contribute to society without any prejudices.
Of course, to achieve tenure isn’t something easy and simple. The process is long and highly-scrutinised. It takes into consideration peer reviews, superiors, and so much more.
Unfortunately, there is no such system in Malaysia. Hence, our country’s academicians are never free from pressurising factors that can prejudice their work.
A few years ago, Prof. Dr. Aziz Bari was suspended from his position at the International Islamic University and subsequently lost it for statements he made on the politics of the state.
And a few months ago, Prof. Datuk Dr. Mohammad Redzuan Othman had to leave his position as UMCEDEL’s (UM Centre for Democracy and Elections) director, allegedly for research findings that were unfavourable.
His post as the dean of UM’s Faculty of Arts and Social Science was also not renewed even though he had been voted for by his colleagues.
This week, Associate Prof. Dr. Azmi Sharom from UM had to appear in court as he was charged for sedition based on a statement he made in a news article regarding the Selangor menteri besar crisis.
All this might give the impression that Malaysian academicians do not have freedom of expression. And if academicians are not given that freedom, how as a society do we progress?
In my humble opinion, be it right or wrong the statement made by an academic, he or she makes it based on the knowledge and experience as an academic.
Other people can then join the debate and discussion, hence creating an environment of intellectual discourse that will lead to a more developed society.
But maybe that is where the danger lies. Creating intellectual discourse and debate among the members of a society could breed dissent. And that, I guess, needs to be avoided at all cost.
So the best first step would be to curb the academicians and intellectuals. Then, the average people in society would not have knowledge to base their thinking on.
Prophet Muhammad once said:
“Whoever conceals knowledge would be muzzled on the Day of Resurrection with a muzzle of fire.”
He also said:
“He is not from my followers, he who does not respect his elders, who does not show mercy to the young and who does not give due right to a scholar.”
So what does that say of us as a society if we start muzzling our academics? And if even academicians are muzzled, what does that mean for us ordinary people?
Zan Azlee
Thu Sep 04 2014
If they start muzzling academics, who will be next?
Malaysia, Thailand tingkatkan kerjasama perangi jenayah rentas sempadan
Kerjasama itu telah dibincangkan ketika mesyuarat dua hala beliau dengan Timbalan Perdana Menteri merangkap Menteri Dalam Negeri Thailand Anutin Charnvirakul pada Khamis.
YouTube uji ciri 'tanya AI' untuk rumuskan video
Apabila butang Ask ditekan, beberapa dialog diberikan oleh chatbot dengan gambar profil seakan ikon Gemini.
Usaha cari bakat baharu golongan Orang Asli, luar bandar perlu dipergiat - Hannah
Kementerian Belia dan Sukan tidak sesekali akan meminggirkan kanak-kanak Orang Asli dan luar bandar dalam menyediakan peluang dan akses untuk bersukan.
Lelaki bakar diri di luar mahkamah perbicaraan Trump meninggal dunia
Maxwell Azzarello didakwa menuang cecair mudah terbakar pada tubuhnya sebelum melemparkan risalah teori konspirasi ke udara.
PKR Sabah minta PM tumpu ikhtiar noktah kemiskinan tegar, isu dokumentasi
Tumpuan kepada ikhtiar menoktahkan kemiskinan tegar dan isu dokumentasi rakyat antara tiga cadangan khusus diutarakan Majlis Pimpinan Negeri (MPN) PKR Sabah kepada Perdana Menteri.
Harga jualan maksimum benih padi sah program IBPS RM54, RM58
Harga jualan maksimum benih padi sah CL220 bagi program Insentif Benih Padi Sah (IBPS) ditetapkan pada kadar RM54 di peringkat pemborong dan RM58 di peringkat peruncit berkuat kuasa 15 April.
PN masih menunggu butiran memorandum mengenai peruntukan
Perikatan Nasional masih menunggu butiran memorandum persefahaman yang akan dikemukakan oleh Kerajaan Perpaduan selepas pertemuan antara kerajaan dan wakil Ahli Parlimen pembangkang baru baru ini.
Tun Hanif selamat dikebumi Tanah Perkuburan Islam Bukit Kiara
Jenazah Allahyarham Tun Hanif Omar selamat dikebumikan jam 3.17 petang pada Sabtu.
Kekejaman Zionis: Rakyat Palestin terkorban melepasi 34,000 nyawa
Angka kematian rakyat Palestin akibat serangan Israel kini melepasi 34,000 nyawa setakat Jumaat.
AWANI Ringkas: Keputusan kolektif MCA
Ikuti rangkuman berita utama yang menjadi tumpuan sepanjang hari di Astro AWANI menerusi AWANI Ringkas.
Sabah Memilih: SPR akan perketat SOP
Laluan khas akan disediakan bagi golongan warga emas berusia 70 tahun ke atas.
Profesor UM cabar kesahihan Akta Hasutan 1948
Pensyarah Undang-Undang Universiti Malaya, Prof Azmi Sharom memfailkan permohonan untuk mengkaji semula perlembagaan Akta Hasutan 1948 di Mahkamah Sesyen hari ini.
Akta Hasutan: Kes Azmi Sharom akan disemak semula - Gani Patail
Peguam Negara, Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail berkata, keputusan mengenai penyemakan semula itu juga akan dimuktamadkan dalam masa terdekat.